← Back to the tool

Biochar Suitability Assessment

Lane Co. spring biochar assessment

USDA NRCS supported
Field
River Bend Field · Santa Clara, OR · 29.4 ac
Location
44.1080° N, 123.0647° W
Soil
Willamette silt loam — clay 18% · OM 3.4% · pH 5.9 · CEC 22 · HSG B
Source
SSURGO · OR039 · MUKEY 46801
Date
June 16, 2026

1 · Field readiness

Moderately suited · 51/100 response potential

Willamette silt loam is moderately suited to receive biochar — moderate headroom for biochar to improve its dynamic properties. No use-invariant site constraints flagged.

2 · Biochar suitability for selected goals

Goals: Improve water retention · Increase soil organic matter · Carbon sequestration

BiocharFeedstock · HTTScore
Douglas-fir slash, 550°C Best fit Softwood · 550°C 78/100
Mixed hardwood, 650°C Hardwood · 650°C 64/100

Douglas-fir slash, 550°C is the better match for this field: its high porosity and a milder pH that better fits the Pachic Ultic Argixerolls profile edges out Mixed hardwood, 650°C, weighted toward your organic-matter building and carbon sequestration goals.

Why Douglas-fir slash, 550°C scores as it does

  • Improve water retention — 73/100. Scores 73/100 for water retention, driven by its high porosity.
  • Increase soil organic matter — 81/100. Scores 81/100 for organic-matter building, driven by its high fixed-carbon content.
  • Carbon sequestration — 79/100. Scores 79/100 for carbon sequestration, driven by its stable, low-H:C carbon.

3 · Limitations & disclaimers

  • Not a recommendation. This is advisory decision support to inform a conversation with an NRCS conservationist — not a prescription to apply biochar.
  • Site constraints flagged above (e.g. ponding, flooding, karst) are conditions biochar cannot change; address them independently.
  • Soil values are SSURGO-derived for the mapped field. A site-specific lab soil test or biochar analytical report should override these defaults where available.
  • Prototype. All biochar and soil figures are mock; scoring is a deterministic stand-in for the USDA ARS algorithms.