Fish Monitoring Studies

Type
Commitment List
Project
Delta Conveyance
Exported
2026-10-19
Commitments
25
CommitmentTitleRequirements
COA 10
COA 10.18Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan4
COA 10.18.1Monitoring Plan and Report Review and Finalization Process1
COA 10.18.2Long-term Purpose of Fish Monitoring and Studies1
COA 10.18.3Alternative Operating Criteria for Hydrograph Limbs2
COA 10.19Fisheries Evaluation Studies1
COA 10.19.1Migration and Survival Study2
COA 10.19.2Predation Study3
COA 10.19.3Abundance and Distribution Study3
COA 10.20Water Quality Evaluation Studies1
COA 10.20.1Installation of New Real-time Monitoring Station2
COA 10.20.2Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Study3
COA 10.20.3Harmful Algal Blooms Monitoring Plan1
COA 10.20.4Selenium Bioaccumulation Study Plan1
COA 10.20.5Mercury Monitoring Study Plan2
COA 10.21Ecological Response Evaluation Studies1
COA 10.21.1Hydrodynamics at Georgiana Slough Monitoring1
COA 10.21.2Covered Fish Species Life Cycle Models1
COA 10.21.3Food Web and Larval Fishes Entrainment Study3
COA 10.21.4Tidal Wetland Restoration Efficacy Study1
COA 10.21.5Delta Smelt and Longfin Smelt Spawning Habitat Study1
COA 10.21.6Refugia Design and Field Study1
COA 10.21.7Sacramento River Flow Reversal and Routing Minimization2
COA 10.21.8Joint Operations Optimization Study3
COA 10.21.9Modeling Needed to Implement Real-time Operations1
COA 10.21.10Ascending and Descending Hydrograph Limb Studies1

COA 10

Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan

COA 10.18

  1. Develop Draft Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan

    Within twelve months of permit issuance, Permittee shall, in coordination with CDFW, initiate development of a draft Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan for CDFW review.

  2. Submit Final Fish Monitoring Plan for CDFW Approval

    Permittee shall submit a final draft plan to CDFW for review no less than six months prior to the first deadline established in the plan and no less than five years before initiation of in-water construction Covered Activities.

  3. Conduct Covered Fish Species Monitoring Across Project Phases

    Permittee shall initiate Covered Fish Species monitoring and science activities prior to Project in-water construction and shall continue Covered Fish Species monitoring and science activities throughout Project construction and operations (Phase 1 Operations and Phase 2 Operations).

  4. Report Aquatic Conditions in Phase 2 Package and Final Report

    Permittee shall include assessments of aquatic conditions in each monitoring time period described below in the Phase 2 Operations Authorization Package (Condition of Approval 7.1) and the Final Mitigation Report following completion of Phase 2 Operations (Condition of Approval 10.15) to facilitate CDFW evaluation of changes in aquatic conditions throughout Project construction and operations.

Monitoring Plan and Report Review and Finalization Process

COA 10.18.1

  1. Adhere to CDFW Review Process for Fish Study Plans and Reports

    Permittee shall submit draft plans to CDFW for review according to the timelines in the CDFW-approved Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan, and as specified in each Condition of Approval.

Long-term Purpose of Fish Monitoring and Studies

COA 10.18.2

  1. Evaluate Fish Monitoring Results Against Biological Criteria

    Permittee shall work collaboratively with CDFW to use the results from science and monitoring required in Conditions of Approval 10.18, 10.19, 10.20, 10.21, 10.26, and 10.27 to 1) ensure that impacts to Covered Fish Species during Phase 2 Operations do not exceed Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria, and 2) prepare for future regulatory processes that may address long-term authorizations for Project operations.

Alternative Operating Criteria for Hydrograph Limbs

COA 10.18.3

  1. Evaluate Hydrograph Limb Impacts on Covered Fish Species

    By 2030, Permittee shall, in coordination with CDFW, use best available science and information gained from studies required by this ITP (Conditions of Approval 10.18, 10.19, 10.20, and 10.21) to evaluate differences in impacts to Covered Fish Species in January and February between ascending and descending limbs of the Sacramento River hydrograph.

  2. Consult CDFW on ITP Amendment for Alternative Operating Criteria

    Permittee shall consult with CDFW if it seeks to amend the ITP (Condition of Approval 8) to modify Conditions of Approval 11.111 and 11.111.2.

Fisheries Evaluation Studies

COA 10.19

  1. Conduct Fisheries Evaluation Studies for Covered Fish Species

    Permittee shall conduct Fisheries Evaluation Studies to characterize baseline conditions and uncertainties regarding the effects of Covered Activities (construction, operations, and maintenance) on Covered Fish Species.

Migration and Survival Study

COA 10.19.1

  1. Develop Migration and Survival Study Plan

    Permittee shall, in collaboration with CDFW, develop a Migration and Survival Study Plan to 1) assess the baseline behavior and survival of CHNWR, CHNSR, and WS in river reaches potentially impacted by Project construction and operation and 2) evaluate changes to baseline conditions established during In-water Preconstruction Baseline Monitoring as the Project is implemented during In-water Construction Monitoring, Phase 1 Operations Monitoring, and Phase 2 Operations Monitoring.

  2. Fund and Implement Migration and Survival Telemetry Study

    Permittee shall fund and initiate the CDFW-approved study plan as informed by the final Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan (Condition of Approval 10.18).

Predation Study

COA 10.19.2

  1. Develop Predation Study Plan

    Permittee shall, in collaboration with CDFW, develop a Predation Study Plan to assess the baseline risk of predation to DS, LFS, CHNWR, CHNSR, and WS in river reaches potentially impacted by Project construction and operations, including areas immediately adjacent to the north Delta intakes.

  2. Capture, Tag, and Survey Predatory Fish Distribution

    Permittee shall employ several methods, as approved by CDFW, to capture predatory fish and retain a subsample for diet analysis. Permittee shall tag predatory fish with acoustic transmitters compatible with the dominant concurrently installed acoustic array within the Delta and pursuant to the Migration and Survival Study.

  3. Measure Predation Rate on Covered Fish Species

    Permittee shall use the following approaches to measure predation, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW:

Abundance and Distribution Study

COA 10.19.3

  1. Develop Covered Fish Species Abundance and Distribution Study Plan

    develop a Covered Fish Species Abundance and Distribution Study Plan to assess the baseline densities and seasonal and geographic distribution of all life stages of DS, LFS, CHNWR, CHNSR, and WS in river reaches potentially impacted by Project construction and operations

  2. Conduct Near-Field Abundance and Distribution Monitoring

    Permittee shall fund and initiate abundance and fine‐scale distribution studies according to timelines established in the Covered Fish Species Monitoring and Science Plan (Condition of Approval 10.18) and continue implementation annually through Phase 2 Operations Monitoring.

  3. Conduct Far-Field Abundance and Distribution Monitoring

    Permittee shall use a combination of existing IEP Delta monitoring programs (e.g., CDFW Summer Townet Survey, Fall Midwater Trawl Survey, Smelt Larval Surveys; USFWS Enhanced Delta Smelt Monitoring Program and Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program; CDFW and USFWS Kodiak Trawl and 20 mm Trawl) and night sampling, as approved by CDFW and USFWS.

Water Quality Evaluation Studies

COA 10.20

  1. Conduct Water Quality Evaluation Studies Program

    conduct Water Quality Evaluation Studies to characterize baseline conditions and uncertainties regarding the effects of Covered Activities (construction, operations, and maintenance) on Covered Fish Species

Installation of New Real-time Monitoring Station

COA 10.20.1

  1. Install and Maintain Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Station

    Permittee shall fund, install, and maintain a new real-time monitoring station downstream of the north Delta diversion Intake C before initiation of In-Water Preconstruction Baseline Monitoring.

  2. Develop Hydraulic Data Plan for Operating Criteria

    Permittee shall work collaboratively with CDFW to develop a Hydraulic Data Plan to use the data obtained from this new real-time monitoring station, in addition to upstream monitoring stations described in Section 20.2.1 of the Project Description and existing stations, to implement operating criteria described in Conditions of Approval 11.109 and 11.111.

Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Study

COA 10.20.2

  1. Develop Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Study Plan

    Permittee shall, in collaboration with CDFW, develop a Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Study Plan to: 1) Assess the baseline sediment transfer in river reaches potentially impacted by Covered Activities (construction and operations); 2) Evaluate changes to baseline conditions established during In-water Preconstruction Baseline Monitoring occurring from Covered Activities measured during In-water Construction Monitoring, and Phase 1 and Phase 2 Operations Monitoring; and 3) Establish sediment…

  2. Implement Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Through Phase 2 Operations

    Permittee shall initiate the CDFW-approved study plan after installation of the new real-time monitoring station (Condition of Approval 10.20.1), and shall continue implementation through Phase 2 Operations.

  3. Develop and Implement Sediment Reintroduction Plan if Criteria Unmet

    If results of the Sediment and Turbidity Monitoring Study indicate that performance criteria will not be met, Permittee shall develop a Sediment Reintroduction Plan to reintroduce sediment and create conditions in the Project Area that meet performance criteria.

Harmful Algal Blooms Monitoring Plan

COA 10.20.3

  1. Develop and Implement Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring Plan

    Before initiation of Phase 1 Operations, Permittee shall develop and implement a Harmful Algal Bloom Plan to monitor baseline frequency, duration, and intensity of harmful algal blooms in river reaches potentially impacted by Project operations using a combination of field surveys and hydrodynamic modeling of residence time.

Selenium Bioaccumulation Study Plan

COA 10.20.4

  1. Develop and Implement Selenium Bioaccumulation Monitoring

    Before initiation of Phase 1 Operations, Permittee shall develop and implement a Selenium Bioaccumulation Study Plan to evaluate the effect of Covered Activities on selenium bioaccumulation in DS and LFS.

Mercury Monitoring Study Plan

COA 10.20.5

  1. Develop and Implement Mercury Monitoring Study

    Permittee, in collaboration with CDFW, shall develop and implement a Mercury Monitoring Study Plan to evaluate changes in mercury concentrations in the ecosystem from Covered Activities (construction and operations).

  2. Develop and Implement Methylmercury Management Approach if Criteria Exceeded

    If Project impacts exceed Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria, Permittee shall develop methylmercury management approaches and implement them consistent with the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Methylmercury and Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Methylmercury and Total Mercury in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary.

Ecological Response Evaluation Studies

COA 10.21

  1. Conduct Ecological Response Evaluation Studies Program

    conduct Ecological Response Evaluation Studies to characterize baseline conditions and uncertainties regarding the effects of Covered Activities (construction, operations, and maintenance) on Covered Fish Species

Hydrodynamics at Georgiana Slough Monitoring

COA 10.21.1

  1. Develop and Implement Georgiana Slough Hydrodynamics Monitoring

    Permittee shall develop a Hydrodynamics at Georgiana Slough Monitoring Study Plan to monitor the timing, magnitude, frequency, and duration of Sacramento River reverse flows at the Georgiana Slough junction and evaluate changes to baseline conditions from Covered Activities (construction and operations) through Phase 2 Operations.

Covered Fish Species Life Cycle Models

COA 10.21.2

  1. Fund and Support Covered Fish Species Life Cycle Models

    Permittee shall 1) fund the development and refinement of the following life cycle models; and 2) provide data to consider in life cycle model updates to quantify the effects of Covered Activities (construction, operations, and maintenance) through Phase 2 Operations and ensure compliance with Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria (Conditions of Approval 11.115, 11.116, and 11.117)

Food Web and Larval Fishes Entrainment Study

COA 10.21.3

  1. Conduct Baseline Food Web Resource Surveys

    Permittee shall use existing monitoring surveys, such as 20mm Survey, Environmental Monitoring Program, Fall Midwater Trawl Survey, Summer Townet Survey, the Fish Restoration Program, and new monitoring surveys near the north Delta intakes to quantify the distribution and abundance of Covered Fish Species food web resources in river reaches potentially impacted by Project operations.

  2. Monitor Food Web and Larval Fish Entrainment During Operations

    Permittee shall monitor behind the north Delta intake fish screens to quantify the abundance of food web resources, DS and LFS larvae and juveniles, WS larvae and juveniles, and CHNWR and CHNSR fry being entrained into the north Delta intakes.

  3. Incorporate Food Web and Entrainment Results into Life Cycle Models

    Permittee shall incorporate near-field and far-field impacts from changes in food web resources and Covered Fish Species entrainment into Covered Fish Species life cycle models to evaluate effects of Project operations on DS, LFS, CHNWR, CHNSR, and WS populations and ensure compliance with the Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria (Conditions of Approval 11.115, 11.116, and 11.117).

Tidal Wetland Restoration Efficacy Study

COA 10.21.4

  1. Develop Tidal Wetland Restoration Efficacy Study and Evaluate Benefits

    Before Phase 1 Operations begin, Permittee shall develop a Tidal Wetland Restoration Efficacy Study Plan that uses monitoring data from the Fish Restoration Program, and potentially other data sources, to analyze the efficacy of restored tidal wetlands in producing food web resources.

Delta Smelt and Longfin Smelt Spawning Habitat Study

COA 10.21.5

  1. Fund and Implement DS/LFS Spawning Habitat Study

    At least one year before initiating in-water construction Covered Activities, Permittee shall, in collaboration with CDFW, fund and implement a study to evaluate the impact of Covered Activities (construction, operations, and maintenance) on DS and LFS spawning habitat as part of the Abundance and Distribution Study (Condition of Approval 10.19.3).

Refugia Design and Field Study

COA 10.21.6

  1. Develop Refugia Design and Field Study Plan

    Permittee shall develop a Refugia Design and Field Study Plan to implement a study to inform the design and optimization of fish refugia at the north Delta intakes.

Sacramento River Flow Reversal and Routing Minimization

COA 10.21.7

  1. Manage Diversions to Minimize Sacramento River Flow Reversals

    By adhering to the requirements in Conditions of Approval 11.109, 11.110, 11.111, 11.112, 11.113, and 11.114 Permittee shall manage diversions at the north Delta intakes at all times to minimize increases in the timing, magnitude, frequency, or duration of flow reversals in the Sacramento River at the Georgiana Slough junction above pre-Project levels.

  2. Assess Juvenile Salmon Route Entrainment by Reach and Junction

    Permittee shall assess changes in CHNWR and CHNSR route entrainment by reach within the lower Sacramento River and through the Delta between baseline conditions established during In-water Preconstruction Baseline Monitoring and In-water Construction Monitoring, and Phase 1 and Phase 2 Operations Monitoring using the Hydrodynamics at Georgiana Slough Monitoring Study and the Far-field Routing and Survival Study (Conditions of Approval 10.21.1 and 10.19.1).

Joint Operations Optimization Study

COA 10.21.8

  1. Ensure Operations Meet Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria

    Permittee shall ensure that Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria are met during Phase 1 and Phase 2 operations (Conditions of Approval 11.115, 11.116, and 11.117).

  2. Develop and Implement Joint Operations Optimization Study Plan

    During In-water Preconstruction Monitoring, Permittee shall convene a team of biologists and hydrologic engineers to collaboratively develop a Joint Operations Optimization Study Plan that will describe a series of modeling studies, informed by empirical data, to evaluate a wide range of possible joint operations scenarios, including approaches to balancing diversions between north and south for carriage water savings, and associated implications for Delta biotic and abiotic conditions,…

  3. Report Joint Operations Study Results in Phase 2 Authorization Package

    Permittee shall include a final report documenting results of the studies and demonstrating the Project’s ability to meet Covered Species Biological Criteria as a part of the Phase 2 Authorization Package (Condition of Approval 7.1).

Modeling Needed to Implement Real-time Operations

COA 10.21.9

  1. Evaluate and Refine Real-Time Operations Modeling Tools

    Permittee shall collaborate with CDFW throughout In-water Preconstruction and In-water Construction Monitoring to evaluate the ability of existing modeling tools to implement Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria as a part of real-time operations (Conditions of Approval 11.115, 11.116, and 11.117). Permittee shall collaborate with CDFW to refine existing modeling tools, or develop new modeling tools, to ensure that Covered Fish Species Biological Criteria can be evaluated in real-time and…

Ascending and Descending Hydrograph Limb Studies

COA 10.21.10

  1. Model Ascending Versus Descending Hydrograph Limb Impacts

    Permittee shall work collaboratively with CDFW to utilize new information gained from Conditions of Approval 10.18, 10.19, 10.20, and 10.21 in this ITP to conduct new modeling and evaluate differences in impacts to Covered Fish Species as a result of Project operations during times when the Sacramento River hydrograph is ascending or descending.